The human rights system has tried to monitor the implementation of the Prohibition of torture by creating mechanisms such as the UN anti-torture committee and international courts. However, challenges such as the lack of cooperation of some countries, weakness in the implementation of international decisions and cultural and political differences have prevented this goal from being fully realized.The application of such approaches to the internal rights of countries is one of the ways of sustainable legal and judicial development, which is the necessity and importance of the present article.In the legal and religious system of Iran, in view of the ideological teachings, the Prohibition of torture has also been introduced as one of the prohibited and inhumane approaches, and the confession resulting from it is not considered a proof of a lawsuit.With a descriptive and analytical look and documented method following the visual presentation of the Prohibition of torture in the Iranian legal system with a comparative study of the international system of human and Islamic rights We are. It seems that the formation of civil supervisory commissions, like the jury model, can be a good way to respect the rights of the accused, like the lack of torture and so on.