Identifying the right to legitimate defenses for women with disabilities domestic violence in light of the concept of beaten women's syndrome and post traumatic disorder

Noori Roomanan, Fatemeh

Identifying the right to legitimate defenses for women with disabilities domestic violence in light of the concept of beaten women's syndrome and post traumatic disorder

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Fatemeh Noori roomanan

PhD in Criminal Law and Criminology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Women with disabilities experience domestic violence in terms of criminology. On the one hand, due to physical or mental disabilities, they are the favorable siblings of criminals determined to be criminals, and on the other hand, this particular situation exposes them to all kinds of domestic violence. Legal systems, especially those who consider themselves adhering to the approaches raised in international documents and conventions related to the protection of the disabled, have tried to consider the right of legitimate differential defense for women with disabilities who suffer from domestic violence in light of some psychological concepts, especially beaten women's syndrome and post-traumatic disorder, so that this group of women, if faced with domestic violence, can benefit from the privileges of legitimate differential defense and, while resorting to legitimate defense against illicit attack, can also benefit from the rights of legitimate differential defense.they're going to take criminal responsibility. The legal system of the United States and the United Kingdom have valuable experience in this regard, which is discussed in this article. However, the Iranian legal system is in great weakness in this regard, and the appeal of disabled women who have committed domestic violence to legitimate defense in Iranian law is possible only on the basis of general and general rules and regulations, and no specific legal or judicial protection of these women has been done in the Iranian legal system.It should be noted that the type of research present is fundamental, its approach, descriptive - analytical, how to do it, Library study and information collection tools in it are also phishing.

Keywords

Legitimate defense

people with disabilities

Iranian rights

us Rights

domestic violence

الف):منابع فارسی
- آقائی نیا، ح.، و گلدره، پ. (۱۳۹۴). عدم انطباق واقعیت با اندیشه بزهکار در دفاع مشروع. مجله مطالعات حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی، ۱۷(۲).
- اردبیلی، م. ع. (۱۳۹۵). حقوق جزای عمومی (جلد اول) (چاپ چهل و سوم). انتشارات میزان.
- حبیب زاده، م. ج.، و میرمجیدی، س. (۱۳۹۰). دفاع مشروع در پرتو سندرم زنان کتک خورده. مجله فقه و حقوق اسلامی، ۳(۴).
- رقیبی، م.، و همکاران. (۱۳۹۵). بررسی شیوع و ارتباط متغیرهای فردی با اختلال استرس پس از سانحه در زندانیان. مجله علوم مراقبتی نظامی، ۳(۱).
- ساوالانی، ا. (۱۳۹۴). حقوق جزای عمومی (چاپ چهارم). انتشارات مشاهیر دادآفرین.
- سلیمی، ص. (۱۳۹۷). چکیده حقوق جزایی عمومی (چاپ سوم). نشر جنگل.
- صابری، ر. (۱۳۹۲). دفاع مشروع و پیشگیری وضعی [پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی]. سامانه پایان‌نامه‌های دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
- صادقی، م.، و همکاران. (۱۳۹۹). اختلال استرس پس از حادثه. فصلنامه طب کار، ۱۲(۳).
- فلچر، ج. پ. (۱۳۹۲). مفاهیم بنیادین حقوق کیفری (س. م. سیدزاده ثانی، مترجم) (چاپ چهارم). انتشارات دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی. (تاریخ نشر اثر اصلی: ۱۹۹۸)
- محمودی جانکی، ف.، و صادقی، آ. (۱۳۹۴). دفاع مشروع ظاهری. مجله آموزه‌های حقوق کیفری، ۱۰(۱).
- منتی‌نژاد، ص. (۱۳۹۰). کاربرد معیارهای عینی و ذهنی در حقوق کیفری [رساله دکتری، دانشگاه تهران]. سامانه انتشارات علمی دانشگاه تهران.
- میرمحمدصادقی، ح. (۱۳۹۰). لزوم به رسمیت شناختن حق دفاع مشروع زنان قربانی خشونت در مراجع قضایی. مجله تحقیقات حقوقی (یادنامه شادروان استاد دکتر رضا نوربها)، (زمستان).
- نوربها، ر. (۱۳۹۶). زمینه حقوق جزای عمومی (چاپ چهل و ششم). انتشارات گنج دانش.
- نوشیروانی، م.، و همکاران. (۱۳۹۹). سندرم زنان کتک خورده. مجله مطالعات ناتوانی، ۱۰(۱).
- نوغانی، ف.، و محتشمی، ج. (۱۳۹۴). بهداشت روان (جلد دوم) (چاپ ششم). انتشارات کلبه.
ب):منابع لاتین
- Aushteen, J. (2011). Basic of criminal law. Oxford University Press.
- Baron, M. (2005). Justifications and excuses. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2.
- Baron, M. (2009). Justifications and excuses. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2.
- Bert, T. (2012). Mental self defense. Brothers.
- Botterell, A. (2009). A primer on distinction between justification and excuse. University of Western Ontario, Blackwell Publishing.
- Buffer, J. H. (2015). The mental element of crime. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Ceesy, N. (2012). The elements of crime. Britanica.
- Cheetman, D. (2014). Substantive criminal law. Oxford University Press.
- Christopher, R. L. (2007). Mistake of fact in the objective theory of justification: Do two rights make two wrongs make two rights…? The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85(2).
- Coleman, M. (2013). Criminal responsibility & mens rea. Oxford University Press.
- Dressler, J. (2012). New thoughts about the concept of justification in the criminal law. Hoffman Publication.
- Duff, R. A. (2004). Rethinking justifications. Tulsa Law Review, 39.
- Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2009). Analyzing criminal behavior. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 4.
- Ferzan, K. K. (2005). Justifying self-defense. Law and Philosophy, 24. Rutgers University, School of Law.
- Fischer, T. (2013). Reasonable fear, self defense and criminal law. Foster Publication.
- Fontaine, R. G. (2010). Self-defense. American Criminal Law Review, 47.
- Francisco Muñoz Conde. (2008). Putative self–defense: A borderline case between justification and excuse. New Criminal Law Review, 11(4).
- Hans, P. (2013). Self-defense laws in the U.S.. Scharff Publication.
- Hansel, O. (2009). Mistake of law is no excuse? It might be a justification! Repository Publication.
- Harrimann, P. (2013). Obstacles of criminal law. Harvard University Press.
- Heinz, E. F. (2013). Self-defense in criminal law. Roshgate Publication.
- Heinz, E. F. (2014). Criminal law and fact mistakes. Roshgate Publication.
- Kaplan, J., & Weisberg, R. (2011). Criminal law: Cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
- Kombersky, M. (2012). Mental mistake in self-defense. Host Publication.
- Maarsk, R. (2008). German criminal law and mental mistake: Theories and challenges. Host Publication.
- Mc Canon, D. (2015). Criminal law and self defense. Oxford University Press.
- Moore, M. S., & Hurd, H. (2011). Punishing the awkward, the stupid, the weak, and the selfish: The culpability of negligence. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 5.
- Nourf, V. F. (2011). Self-defense and subjectivity. The University of Chicago Law Review, 68(4).
- O'Sullivan, G. (2012). Self defense. George Washington University Law Center.
- Segev, R. (2012). Fairness, responsibility and self-defense. Santa Clara Law Review, 45(2).
- Zibber, A. (2011). Why we rationalize our mistakes: Foolish beliefs and how to pop the bubble of self-justification. Mastery.
- Zonfen, E. (2012). Self-defense and defense of others. Justia.