The place of proof and Citation of the types of evidence of the case with emphasis on the concealment of the accused

Saryar, Narjes

The place of proof and Citation of the types of evidence of the case with emphasis on the concealment of the accused

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Narjes Saryar

Independent Researcher in Law and Management (PhD), Eyvanki Non-Profit Institute

Abstract

Sometimes we see that despite the sufficient evidence and even the confession of some of the accused who may have confessed at different stages of a court case, but later deny it, we face some kind of change and suspicion in this regard. With a descriptive and analytical look and the use of the library documentation method, we are looking for a response to this situation of denial of the accused.in response, it can be said that denial seems to be part of the inherent and unwritten rights of the accused, but due to sufficient reasons, the observance of his rights in a real and substantive way, not in a formal way, justice must be done. In other literature, the denial of the accused under observation at any stage as one of the rights of the accused and an unwritten law should be in the eyes of the judicial authorities and officers, it will not be reprehensible for this issue, so the judicial authority is responsible for identifying and proving the concealment of the contrary, as the case may be, based on the reasons of other in the case.

Keywords

Accused

evidentiary material

conflicting defense

Judiciary

liberty